Importance of Identifying & Tracking Hackers Activities into Your Network, But for How Long? Are You Skilled Enough?

Shuvro
Post View Count: 20
Reading Time: 4 minutes
 Save as PDF

Overview

To conduct a deep-dive investigation into the principles, practices, and challenges of identifying, tracking, and analyzing malicious actor activities within a corporate network. This document will culminate in a comprehensive, interactive report designed for C-suite executives, IT security leadership, and network architects. The Original Enterprise Planning Report will not only educate but also provide actionable frameworks for assessing and enhancing organizational cybersecurity posture.

Phase 1: Foundational Understanding – The “Why”

Objective: To establish the core premise of why passive observation is insufficient and proactive tracking is a business-critical function.

  • 1.1. The Modern Threat Landscape:
    • Research current trends in cyber attacks (e.g., APTs, ransomware-as-a-service, supply chain attacks, zero-day exploits).
    • Gather statistics on dwell time (the period from initial compromise to detection).
    • Identify the primary motivations of attackers (financial gain, espionage, disruption, hacktivism).
  • 1.2. The Cost of Ignorance:
    • Collate data on the financial impact of security breaches (regulatory fines, cleanup costs, reputational damage, stock price impact).
    • Investigate case studies of major breaches where long dwell times exacerbated damage (e.g., SolarWinds, Equifax).
  • 1.3. Defining “Tracking” vs. “Blocking”:
    • Articulate the difference between preventative measures (firewalls, AV) and detective/responsive measures (threat hunting, EDR, SIEM).
    • Establish the concept that a breach is not a single event but a campaign of activities.

Phase 2: The Breach – Understanding Hacker Activities & Identifying Rogue Transmissions

Objective: To detail the methodologies hackers use to infiltrate and operate, and how their initial communications can be detected.

  • 2.1. Initial Access Vectors:
    • Research common entry points (phishing, exploited vulnerabilities, compromised credentials, insider threats).
    • Analyze the initial network “noise” created during a compromise.
  • 2.2. Defining and Identifying Rogue Transmissions:
    • Define “rogue transmission” in the context of network security (e.g., unauthorized protocols, non-standard port usage, communication with known malicious IPs).
    • Research tools and techniques for detection: NetFlow analysis, IDS/IPS signature and anomaly detection, DNS query logs, certificate transparency logs.
    • Investigate methods for baselining “normal” network traffic to make anomalies stand out.
  • 2.3. Command & Control (C2) Beaconing:
    • Analyze the characteristics of C2 communications (e.g., regular intervals, small packet sizes, “heartbeat” signals).
    • Research techniques for obfuscating C2 traffic (e.g., DNS tunneling, using common services like social media or cloud storage as channels).
    • Gather information on threat intelligence feeds that track active C2 server infrastructures.

Phase 3: The Foothold – What’s It Doing? What’s The Payload?

Objective: To dissect the attacker’s actions post-compromise, focusing on their objectives and the tools they use.

  • 3.1. Post-Exploitation Activities:
    • Research the “living off the land” (LotL) technique, where attackers use legitimate system tools (PowerShell, WMI) to avoid detection.
    • Analyze the patterns of lateral movement within a network (e.g., credential harvesting, pass-the-hash attacks).
    • Investigate privilege escalation techniques.
  • 3.2. Payload Analysis:
    • Define “payload” in various contexts: credential stealers, keyloggers, remote access trojans (RATs), ransomware encryption modules, wipers.
    • Research methodologies for payload analysis: static analysis (dissecting code without running it) vs. dynamic analysis (observing behavior in a sandbox).
    • Investigate the role of Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) tools in identifying and analyzing payload execution on host machines.
  • 3.3. Understanding the Attacker’s Goal Within the Network:
    • Is it reconnaissance for a larger attack?
    • Is it data staging and preparation for exfiltration?
    • Is it setting up persistence mechanisms?
    • Is it actively disrupting operations?

Phase 4: The Objective – Where Is It Sending Collected Data?

Objective: To understand the final stage of many attacks—data exfiltration—and how it can be identified.

  • 4.1. Data Staging:
    • Research how attackers find and aggregate valuable data within a network, often moving it to a single, less-monitored server before exfiltration.
  • 4.2. Exfiltration Techniques:
    • Analyze common methods: large outbound data transfers, slow-and-low transfers hidden within normal traffic, using encrypted channels (HTTPS, DNS over HTTPS), or leveraging cloud service providers.
  • 4.3. Detection of Exfiltration:
    • Research the role of Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions.
    • Investigate how monitoring network egress points and analyzing data flow volumes can reveal exfiltration attempts.
    • Study how firewall logs, especially denials for outbound traffic, can be an indicator.

Phase 5: The Lens – Firewall Visibilities and Their Limitations

Objective: To critically evaluate the role of the firewall in modern threat detection.

  • 5.1. What Firewalls Can See:
    • Research the visibility provided by different firewall types (stateless, stateful, next-generation firewalls – NGFW).
    • Analyze firewall logs: source/destination IPs, ports, protocols, and (with NGFW) application-level data.
  • 5.2. What Firewalls Cannot See:
    • Investigate the “blind spot” of encrypted traffic (SSL/TLS) and the challenges/costs of decryption at scale.
    • Analyze how firewalls are often blind to intra-network lateral movement (east-west traffic).
    • Research how attackers use approved ports (80, 443) to bypass simplistic firewall rules.
  • 5.3. Augmenting Firewall Visibility:
    • Research how integrating firewall logs into a broader Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system enhances visibility through correlation with other data sources (e.g., endpoint logs, authentication logs).

Phase 6: Synthesis – For How Long? Are You Skilled Enough?

Objective: To synthesize the research into actionable conclusions regarding data retention and skill requirements.

  • 6.1. The “How Long?” Question – Data Retention for Forensics:
    • Research industry standards and regulatory requirements for log retention (e.g., PCI-DSS, HIPAA).
    • Analyze the trade-offs between storage cost and forensic capability.
    • Synthesize a framework for a tiered retention policy (e.g., full packet capture for 72 hours, NetFlow for 90 days, firewall logs for 1 year).
  • 6.2. The “Are You Skilled Enough?” Question – The Human Element:
    • Define the core competencies required for a modern security operations center (SOC) analyst: threat hunting, forensic analysis, malware reverse-engineering, data science for security.
    • Research the role of AI and Machine Learning in augmenting human analysts by automating detection of anomalies.
    • Investigate the current cybersecurity skills gap and strategies for upskilling and talent retention.
  • 6.3. The Tooling Question – Building a Modern Detection Stack:
    • Synthesize the roles of key technologies (SIEM, SOAR, EDR, NDR, Threat Intelligence Platforms) and how they must work in concert.
    • Create a maturity model for organizations to self-assess their tracking and detection capabilities.

Final Report Structure (Interactive SPA)

  1. Executive Dashboard: High-level overview with key stats (e.g., average dwell time, cost of breach) and a central navigation hub.
  2. The Attacker’s Journey (Interactive Flowchart): A clickable, step-by-step visualization of a typical cyber attack, from initial access to data exfiltration. Each step will link to a detailed section.
  3. Core Concepts Deep Dive (Thematic Sections):
    • Understanding Activities & Rogue Transmissions
    • Analyzing Payloads & Lateral Movement
    • Detecting Data Exfiltration
    • The Role of the Firewall
  4. The Response Framework (Interactive Assessor):
    • Data Retention Calculator: An interactive tool where users can see the pros and cons of different log retention policies.
    • Skills & Maturity Assessment: A short quiz/checklist for organizations to gauge their readiness and identify gaps in skills and technology.
  5. Case Study Library: Summaries of real-world breaches, filterable by industry and attack type.