Status: Final Blueprint Summary
Author: Shahab Al Yamin Chawdhury
Organization: Principal Architect & Consultant Group
Research Date: July 8, 2023
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Version: 1.0
1.0 The Strategic Imperative of Application Portfolio Management
Application Portfolio Management (APM) is a strategic discipline for managing an enterprise’s software applications as a portfolio of assets. The Gartner TIME Model is the industry-standard framework for this process, enabling organizations to make data-driven decisions to optimize costs, reduce risk, and align IT investments with business objectives.
The model evaluates every application along two primary axes:
- Business Value: How critical the application is to business operations and strategic goals. This is assessed using metrics like strategic fit, functional completeness, user satisfaction, and business criticality.
- Technical Fit: The quality, maintainability, and architectural soundness of the application. This is assessed using metrics like standards compliance, technical debt, reliability, performance, and security posture.
Plotting applications against these axes places them into one of four quadrants, each dictating a clear strategic action.
The Four Quadrants of the Gartner TIME Model
| Quadrant | Business Value | Technical Fit | Description & Strategic Action |
| Tolerate | Low | High | The application is technically sound but provides low strategic value. Action: Minimize investment, monitor for risk, and seek opportunities to consolidate its functionality into other platforms. |
| Invest | High | High | These are the organization’s most valuable and well-performing assets. Action: Maximize value through further investment, feature enhancements, and expanded user adoption to drive competitive advantage. |
| Migrate | High | Low | The application is critical to the business but is a technical liability (e.g., legacy technology, high maintenance costs). Action: Plan and execute a migration or replacement to a modern, sustainable platform to retain business value while reducing risk. |
| Eliminate | Low | Low | The application provides little business value and is technically poor. It consumes resources while offering minimal return. Action: Decommission and retire the application to realize direct cost savings and reduce IT complexity. |
2.0 A Blueprint for Implementation and Execution
A successful APM initiative translates the TIME analysis into an actionable, multi-year transformation plan.
2.1 The Assessment Engine
The foundation of the TIME model is a rigorous, data-driven assessment process:
- Establish an Application Inventory: Create a comprehensive, accurate catalog of all applications, including ownership, costs, and technical details. This serves as the single source of truth.
- Quantify Business & Technical Fit: Use multi-factor scoring models to objectively rate each application. Surveys of business and IT owners are crucial for gathering this data.
- Validate and Plot: Plot the scores on the TIME matrix and validate the quadrant placements with key stakeholders to ensure consensus and buy-in.
2.2 Developing Strategic Roadmaps
The validated TIME matrix dictates the strategic roadmap:
- Quadrant-Specific Action Plans: Develop detailed plans for each quadrant (e.g., a decommissioning plan for “Eliminate” apps, a project charter for “Migrate” apps).
- Sequencing and Dependencies: Analyze application dependencies to sequence initiatives correctly, often grouping them into logical waves (e.g., Wave 1 for cost-cutting, Wave 2 for risk mitigation).
- Budget Alignment: Use the roadmap to justify a strategic shift in the IT budget, reallocating funds from retired (“Eliminate”) and contained (“Tolerate”) applications to high-value (“Invest”) and modernization (“Migrate”) initiatives.
3.0 Governance, Operations, and Continuous Improvement
APM is not a one-time project but a continuous discipline that requires a robust governance framework.
3.1 Governance and Risk Management
- Roles and Responsibilities: Define clear roles such as Application Portfolio Manager, Business Owner, and IT Owner. A RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) matrix is essential to clarify accountability for all APM processes.
- Risk Mitigation: Use the APM inventory and TIME analysis to proactively identify and mitigate risks, such as applications running on end-of-life technology or those with significant security vulnerabilities.
3.2 Measuring Success and Maturity
- Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): Track the success of the APM program with enterprise-grade metrics.
- Financial: Application TCO Reduction, Cost Avoidance from Rationalization.
- Risk: % of Portfolio with High Technical Risk, # of Critical Apps on End-of-Life Tech.
- Strategic: Application Rationalization Index (Apps Retired vs. Apps Added).
- APM Maturity Model: Use a maturity model to benchmark current capabilities and guide continuous improvement, moving the organization from a reactive state to a proactive, innovative one.
| Maturity Level | Name | Key Characteristic |
| 1 | Reactive | No central inventory; decisions are ad-hoc. |
| 2 | Emerging | Inventory established; basic rationalization attempted. |
| 3 | Integrated | APM is a defined, data-driven process linked to the IT budget. |
| 4 | Effective | Portfolio is proactively managed to align with business strategy. |
| 5 | Innovative | APM is a core driver of business strategy and digital innovation. |
By systematically applying the Gartner TIME model, organizations can transform their application portfolio from a costly liability into a strategic asset that enables business agility and growth.
Chat for Professional Consultancy Services
